# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

> Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-llama2-70b-steerlm-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 31.3 to 9.3.
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 31.8 |
| Rank | 332 | 268 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1025 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1047 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1072 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1063 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1060 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 998 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1058 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.