# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout

> Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 4 Scout score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.1 vs 27.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-llama-4-scout
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 4 Scout leads 31.8 to 15.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 62.3% for Llama 4 Scout.
- Llama 4 Scout has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 27.4 |
| Rank | 327 | 323 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Llama 4 Scout: 19.9 (#334)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1286 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9.1% |
| SciCode | — | 17% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.1% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Llama 4 Scout: 24.4 (#109)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.1% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Llama 4 Scout: 9.2 (#339)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1266 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 129.64 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 0.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMCA | — | 12% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Llama 4 Scout: 18.4 (#280)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 7.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1286 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 62.3% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 37.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Llama 4 Scout: 31.8 (#208)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 51.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1236 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 74.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 50.7% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Llama 4 Scout: 31.6 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1118 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 34.2% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Llama 4 Scout: 41.3 (#207)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1253 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1256 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1283 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1274 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1209 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1263 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1277 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1207 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Llama 4 Scout: 66.0 (#212)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1248 |
| IFEval | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1265 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 36% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Llama 4 Scout: 37.1 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1279 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1249 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1281 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 783 |
| WildBench | — | 78% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Llama 4 Scout?

Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 4 Scout score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.1 vs 27.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.6 versus 19.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 4 Scout share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.