# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Llama 3-70B

> Llama 3-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-llama-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 24

## Summary

- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3-70B in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3-70B leads 43.0 to 36.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 22.6% for Llama 3-70B.
- Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 28.5 |
| Rank | 327 | 317 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1206 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | 72% |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | 69% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1195 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 122.91 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 4.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1218 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 22.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 40.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1149 |
| MMLU | 70% | 79.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1231 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1241 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1017 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1194 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1174 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1223 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Llama 3-70B?

Llama 3-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 3-70B share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.