# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Llama 3.2 90B

> Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 3.2 90B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.3 vs 27.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-llama-3-2-90b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 3.2 90B leads 21.7 to 15.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 39.4% for Llama 3.2 90B.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 27.5 |
| Rank | 332 | 331 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 125.5 |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 2.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 39.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 41% |
| MMLU | 70% | 80.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 3.2 90B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.3 vs 27.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 3.2 90B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.