# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Llama 3.2 11B

> Gemini 1.0 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#332); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-llama-3-2-11b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
- Llama 3.2 11B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 32.1 |
| Rank | 332 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- Llama 3.2 11B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Llama 3.2 11B: 27.3

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 16.8% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- Llama 3.2 11B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- Llama 3.2 11B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- Llama 3.2 11B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 70% | 56.5% |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Llama 3.2 11B: 24.4

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 966 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- Llama 3.2 11B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- Llama 3.2 11B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- Llama 3.2 11B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- Llama 3.2 11B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Llama 3.2 11B?

Gemini 1.0 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#332); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 3.2 11B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 11B has 3.