# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Llama 2-13B

> Llama 2-13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-llama-2-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 2-13B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama 2-13B leads 28.7 to 8.7.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 327 | 304 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1062 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1051 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 42.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 105.8 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1065 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1030 |
| MMLU | 70% | 55.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1043 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 894 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1086 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 953 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1046 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1064 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1085 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1050 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Llama 2-13B?

Llama 2-13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.6 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 2-13B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.