# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Llama 13b

> Gemini 1.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.1 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 1.0 Pro leads 36.2 to 13.9.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 23.9 |
| Rank | 327 | 344 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 683 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 728 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 100.09 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 838 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 70% | 47.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 781 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 753 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Llama 13b?

Gemini 1.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.1 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Llama 13b better for coding?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.6 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.