# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.6 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 95.6% for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 327 | 90 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 150.01 |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 95.6% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.