# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Kimi K2.6

> Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-kimi-k2-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.6 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.6 leads 56.8 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 96.1% for Kimi K2.6.
- Kimi K2.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 47.5 |
| Rank | 327 | 52 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Kimi K2.6: 50.5 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1488 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1509 |
| SciCode | — | 53.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 55.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,093 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Kimi K2.6: 21.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| ExploitBench | — | 18.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 12% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,205 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Kimi K2.6: 39.6 (#51)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1470 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 90.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 151.03 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.2% |
| CritPt | — | 8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 2.4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| LMCA | — | 37.3% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Kimi K2.6: 56.8 (#34)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 96.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1475 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 25.6% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 72.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Kimi K2.6: 53.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 90.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1491 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.8% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Kimi K2.6: 31.8 (#95)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1282 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 3.9% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 21.7% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1451 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Kimi K2.6: 55.1 (#35)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1446 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1521 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1449 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1442 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1463 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1428 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Kimi K2.6: 76.5 (#40)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1451 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#50)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1468 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Kimi K2.6: 68.7 (#25)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1434 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1453 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1725 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1202 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?

Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.5 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Kimi K2.6 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.