# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

> Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-hunyuan-large
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 33.1 to 8.7.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 38.0 |
| Rank | 327 | 183 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1307 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1286 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1281 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1276 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1266 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1277 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1342 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1284 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.