# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok 4 Fast

> Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-grok-4-fast
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4 Fast in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 Fast leads 63.2 to 34.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 45.9% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 82.7% for Grok 4 Fast.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 39.0 |
| Rank | 327 | 164 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Grok 4 Fast: 32.3 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1429 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1160 |
| WeirdML | — | 42.9% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Grok 4 Fast: 29.3 (#80)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 15.7% |
| Cybench | — | 30% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Grok 4 Fast: 22.5 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1413 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 82.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 144.21 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 5.3% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 66.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 48.5% |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.5 |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Grok 4 Fast: 36.1 (#126)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1419 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Grok 4 Fast: 31.5 (#211)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1411 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 19.7% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Grok 4 Fast: 51.5 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1397 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1458 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1433 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1383 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1414 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1359 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Grok 4 Fast: 73.4 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1388 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1415 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 94.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Grok 4 Fast: 60.2 (#96)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1407 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1414 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Grok 4 Fast?

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Grok 4 Fast better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.6 vs 32.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4 Fast share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 Fast has 30.