# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok 4.7

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-grok-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 36.2.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 46.6 |
| Rank | 327 | 56 |
| Context | — | 500K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1423 |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1636 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1409 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1393 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1413 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1396 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1406 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4.7 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.