# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok 4.1 Fast

> Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-grok-4-1-fast
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.1 Fast in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 42.3 to 16.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 45.9% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 87.7% for Grok 4.1 Fast.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 40.9 |
| Rank | 327 | 131 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.8 (#236)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1411 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1241 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 394.93 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.1 (#35)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 69.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.1% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 1,107 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.3 (#45)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1407 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 87.7% |
| SimpleBench | — | 56% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 61 |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 30.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1408 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 4% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 32.6 (#203)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1398 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.8% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1201 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.1 (#110)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1416 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1361 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.8 (#127)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1376 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1390 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.4 (#126)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1408 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1394 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1327 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Grok 4.1 Fast?

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?

Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4.1 Fast share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.