# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok 3

> Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-grok-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Grok 3 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 3 leads 46.2 to 15.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 88.7% for Grok 3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 332 | 157 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1432 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 53.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 37.2% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 29.5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1434 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 138.33 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 36.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5.5% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 55.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1391 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 88.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 75.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1421 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.8% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1410 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1448 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1460 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1387 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1417 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1373 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1409 |
| IFEval | — | 88.4% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 58.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1426 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1414 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1425 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.4% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1186 |
| WildBench | — | 84.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Grok 3?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Grok 3 better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 3 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.
