# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Granite 4.2 3b

> Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-granite-4-2-3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 3b in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 35.6 to 15.5.
- Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 39.0 |
| Rank | 327 | 163 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Granite 4.2 3b: 39.4 (#146)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1363 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Granite 4.2 3b: 25.0 (#136)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1308 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Granite 4.2 3b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Granite 4.2 3b: 35.6 (#169)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1313 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Granite 4.2 3b: 42.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1268 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1268 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1249 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Granite 4.2 3b: 67.2 (#195)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1271 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Granite 4.2 3b: 39.3 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1293 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Granite 4.2 3b: 47.9 (#202)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1295 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1215 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1293 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Granite 4.2 3b?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Granite 4.2 3b better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Granite 4.2 3b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 3b has 11.