# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GPT-5

> GPT-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-gpt-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5 leads 55.0 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 91.4% for GPT-5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 50.9 |
| Rank | 332 | 45 |
| Context | — | 400K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- GPT-5: 50.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1436 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 73.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 65% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 88% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1418 |
| SciCode | — | 42.9% |
| GSO | — | 6.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 60.7% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,162 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.67 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- GPT-5: 33.1 (#56)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 49.6% |
| GDPval | — | 34.8% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 1.7% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 49.6% |
| BALROG | — | 32.8% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1133 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 69.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- GPT-5: 38.3 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1416 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 90.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 150 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 9.9% |
| SimpleBench | — | 56.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 65.7% |
| CritPt | — | 12.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 37% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 10.5% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 12.7% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMCA | — | 40% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.4 |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- GPT-5: 55.0 (#44)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 91.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1407 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 98.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 55.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 22% |
| ProofBench | — | 18% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 64.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 32.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 12.5% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- GPT-5: 56.6 (#43)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 86.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1419 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 25.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 50.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 86.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 10.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 14.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 79.2% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- GPT-5: 46.8 (#13)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1232 |
| GeoBench | — | 81% |
| VPCT | — | 66% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- GPT-5: 51.4 (#110)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1397 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1422 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1410 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1416 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1409 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1406 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1360 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- GPT-5: 73.8 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1388 |
| IFEval | — | 87.5% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- GPT-5: 69.5 (#2)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1399 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- GPT-5: 63.4 (#65)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1406 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1365 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1426 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 86% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1627 |
| WildBench | — | 85.7% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GPT-5?

GPT-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GPT-5 better for coding?

GPT-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GPT-5 share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 has 69.