# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GPT-5 Nano

> GPT-5 Nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-gpt-5-nano
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and GPT-5 Nano in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Nano leads 35.9 to 15.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 95.2% for GPT-5 Nano.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 33.5 |
| Rank | 332 | 241 |
| Context | — | 400K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- GPT-5 Nano: 33.6 (#254)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1351 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 34.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 38.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 718.67 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- GPT-5 Nano: 25.8 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 21.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 51.5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- GPT-5 Nano: 16.3 (#306)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1328 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 62.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 139.38 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 2.6% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 20.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 27% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 9% |
| LMCA | — | 7.9% |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.1 |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- GPT-5 Nano: 29.4 (#241)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 81.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1317 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 95.2% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 20% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 2.4% |
| ProofBench | — | 12% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 54.6% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 8.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- GPT-5 Nano: 35.9 (#178)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 69.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1321 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 11.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 77.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 67.9% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1159 |
| VPCT | — | 37.2% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- GPT-5 Nano: 45.3 (#172)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1356 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1327 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1226 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1296 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1269 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- GPT-5 Nano: 75.0 (#79)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1306 |
| IFEval | — | 93.2% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#281)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1312 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 44.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- GPT-5 Nano: 39.1 (#249)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1320 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1249 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1311 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 705 |
| WildBench | — | 80.6% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GPT-5 Nano?

GPT-5 Nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GPT-5 Nano better for coding?

GPT-5 Nano scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.6 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GPT-5 Nano share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Nano has 49.