# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GPT-5.2 Pro

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-gpt-5-2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.2 Pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 8.7.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 52.2 |
| Rank | 327 | 34 |
| Context | — | 400K |
| Input $/M | — | $21 |
| Output $/M | — | $168 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 155.41 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GPT-5.2 Pro?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GPT-5.2 Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.