# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GPT-4

> GPT-4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-gpt-4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 23

## Summary

- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and GPT-4 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where GPT-4 leads 65.3 to 57.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 45.9% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 62.7% for GPT-4.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 332 | 316 |
| Context | — | 8K |
| Input $/M | — | $30 |
| Output $/M | — | $60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- GPT-4: 31.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1254 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | 79.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 12.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 46% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 57.2% |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- GPT-4: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| METR Time Horizons | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- GPT-4: 17.8 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1241 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 62.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 125.89 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMCA | — | 17.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 75.1% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.8 |
| HellaSwag | — | 95.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.5% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- GPT-4: 10.8 (#309)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1269 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 23% |
| GSM8K | — | 92% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- GPT-4: 18.4 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 35.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1211 |
| MMLU | 70% | 86.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 84.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- GPT-4: 40.6 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1246 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1283 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1251 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1209 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1251 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1261 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1184 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- GPT-4: 65.3 (#222)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1241 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- GPT-4: 37.7 (#212)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1244 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- GPT-4: 34.9 (#268)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1257 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 752 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GPT-4?

GPT-4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GPT-4 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (32.2 vs 31.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GPT-4 share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4 has 38.