# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GLM-5.1

> GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-glm-5-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5.1 leads 49.7 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 93.3% for GLM-5.1.
- GLM-5.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 47.8 |
| Rank | 332 | 59 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1485 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 74.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1508 |
| SciCode | — | 43.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 57.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 887.1 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 40.9% |
| ExploitBench | — | 18.1% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,634 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1472 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 149.84 |
| SimpleBench | — | 55.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 77.7% |
| CritPt | — | 4.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 69.8% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1473 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 36.8% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 67.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 22.2% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 33.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 12.5% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 89.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1476 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1447 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1515 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1474 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1465 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1434 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1454 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1469 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1418 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1451 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1466 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1461 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1453 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1472 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1592 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GLM-5.1 better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GLM-5.1 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.1 has 41.