# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GLM-4.6

> GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-glm-4-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.6 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.6 leads 36.4 to 8.7.
- GLM-4.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 40.9 |
| Rank | 327 | 132 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- GLM-4.6: 39.9 (#137)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1449 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1339 |
| SciCode | — | 38.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 340.82 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- GLM-4.6: 32.1 (#60)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 24.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 72.4% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- GLM-4.6: 23.1 (#168)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1440 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 47.4% |
| CritPt | — | 1.1% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- GLM-4.6: 36.4 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1431 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- GLM-4.6: 39.6 (#118)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1432 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.5% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- GLM-4.6: 53.6 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1500 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1459 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1394 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1418 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1436 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1401 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- GLM-4.6: 74.5 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1410 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1423 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- GLM-4.6: 61.3 (#86)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1440 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1427 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1411 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GLM-4.6?

GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GLM-4.6 better for coding?

GLM-4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GLM-4.6 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6 has 29.