# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GLM-4.5V

> GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-glm-4-5v
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.5V leads 34.7 to 8.7.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 39.2 |
| Rank | 327 | 158 |
| Context | — | 64K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1347 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1335 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1353 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1353 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1304 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1338 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1299 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1335 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1311 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1305 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1333 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GLM-4.5V?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GLM-4.5V better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GLM-4.5V share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.