# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemma 4 31B IT

> Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-gemma-4-31b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 4 31B IT in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 41.3 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 73.3% for Gemma 4 31B IT.
- Gemma 4 31B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 43.2 |
| Rank | 327 | 85 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.09 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.34 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.9 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1459 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1364 |
| SciCode | — | 43.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 925.5 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 26.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1448 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 82.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 142.74 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 70.6% |
| CritPt | — | 1.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 53% |
| LMCA | — | 39.3% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 30.6% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.3 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1464 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 75.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1465 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 10.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.0 (#32)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1425 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 54.0 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1431 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1436 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1462 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1443 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.6 (#58)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1433 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1446 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.7 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1443 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1416 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1452 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1368 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1120 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Gemma 4 31B IT?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Gemma 4 31B IT better for coding?

Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 4 31B IT share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 4 31B IT has 35.