# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-gemma-3n-e4b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 35.1 to 9.3.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 332 | 206 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1268 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1284 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1246 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1272 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1305 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1259 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1255 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1276 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1276 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.