# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemma 2 2b IT

> Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-gemma-2-2b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Gemma 2 2b IT in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 30.1 to 8.7.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 32.5 |
| Rank | 327 | 244 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1112 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1113 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1135 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1096 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1132 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1156 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1140 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1055 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1118 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1130 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1156 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1118 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Gemma 2 2b IT?

Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.6 vs 31.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 2 2b IT share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.