# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT

> Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-gemma-1-1-2b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 1.1 2b IT in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads 30.8 to 9.3.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 29.3 |
| Rank | 332 | 313 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1034 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | 17.7% |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | 23.3% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1005 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1047 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 970 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 988 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1012 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 944 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 990 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Korean | — | 899 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 992 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1003 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1022 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 998 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 959 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.