# Falcon-180B vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.7 to 29.3.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 41.5 |
| Rank | 254 | 123 |
| Context | — | 524K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Solar Pro4: 39.9 (#135)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1439 |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- Solar Pro4: 27.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1398 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Solar Pro4: 36.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1418 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Solar Pro4: 39.0 (#128)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1421 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- Solar Pro4: 49.0 (#134)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1417 |
| LMArena French | — | 1403 |
| LMArena German | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1408 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- Solar Pro4: 72.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1376 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Solar Pro4: 42.0 (#125)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1379 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- Solar Pro4: 56.7 (#133)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1313 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1391 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Solar Pro4 share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.