# Falcon-180B vs QwQ-32B

> QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and QwQ-32B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where QwQ-32B leads 50.9 to 29.3.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 254 | 153 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1333 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1326 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | 137.6 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1323 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1378 |
| LMArena French | — | 1337 |
| LMArena German | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1308 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than QwQ-32B?

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and QwQ-32B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.