# Falcon-180B vs Qwen3.6 27B

> Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-qwen3-6-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 27B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 50.3 to 29.1.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 42.2 |
| Rank | 260 | 117 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $3.60 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | 146.5 |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 78.1% |
| LMCA | — | 34.5% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen3.6 27B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.