# Falcon-180B vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 32.0 to 18.3.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 254 | 103 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | 146.79 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | — |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.