# Falcon-180B vs Qwen3 14B

> Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 14B in 0 categories, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 35.0 |
| Rank | 254 | 222 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | 138.23 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | — |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen3 14B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.