# Falcon-180B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads 48.8 to 29.3.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 254 | 314 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | 118.44 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 70.6% | 72.9% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.