# Falcon-180B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

> Falcon-180B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-qwen2-5-72b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads 46.9 to 29.3.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 31.5 |
| Rank | 254 | 259 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $5.60 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 32.8 (#256)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 16% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1293 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.9% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.0 (#124)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 5.7% |
| BALROG | — | 16.2% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 35.8% |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 21.4 (#197)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1271 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | 129.01 |
| HellaSwag | 89% | 84.8% |
| PIQA | 84.9% | 82.6% |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | 82.3% |
| DTBench | — | 62.9% |
| LMCA | — | 13.4% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.8% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 18.1 (#281)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 33% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1283 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 63.2% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 26.9 (#247)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | 94.5% |
| MMLU | 70.6% | 85.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 63.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 19.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1245 |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | — | 71.9% |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.2 (#208)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1252 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1272 |
| LMArena French | — | 1279 |
| LMArena German | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1180 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1188 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1255 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.7 (#216)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1254 |
| IFEval | — | 80.6% |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#183)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1282 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1269 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1221 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1272 |
| WildBench | — | 80.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Falcon-180B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.