# Falcon-180B vs Qwen1.5-110B

> Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-qwen1-5-110b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 38.0 to 29.1.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 34.2 |
| Rank | 260 | 234 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1168 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1185 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1206 |
| LMArena French | — | 1151 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1158 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen1.5-110B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.