# Falcon-180B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 46.4 to 29.3.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 254 | 191 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1292 |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1272 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1294 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1241 |
| LMArena French | — | 1262 |
| LMArena German | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1288 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1246 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.