# Falcon-180B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Falcon-180B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 32.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.3 to 29.3.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 254 | 248 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1210 |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1208 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Falcon-180B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 32.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.