# Falcon-180B vs o3-pro

> o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-o3-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and o3-pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o3-pro leads 57.1 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 260 | 105 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $20 |
| Output $/M | — | $80 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
- o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | 147.42 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | — |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | — |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
- o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than o3-pro?

o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and o3-pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.