# Falcon-180B vs Mistral Medium 3.5

> Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-mistral-medium-3-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 58.6 to 29.3.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 39.6 |
| Rank | 254 | 151 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1461 |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1436 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | 141.42 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1432 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1431 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Falcon-180B: —
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1222 |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1443 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1453 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1406 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1414 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1414 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1372 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.