# Falcon-180B vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 260 | 103 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1447 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1456 |
| LMArena French | — | 1469 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1445 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.