# Falcon-180B vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.4 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 43.6 |
| Rank | 260 | 88 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1466 |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1445 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1430 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1434 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1428 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1445 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.