# Falcon-180B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.8 to 29.1.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 260 | 49 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1534 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1512 |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1494 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1543 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1480 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1493 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1501 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1464 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.