# Falcon-180B vs MiMo-V2.5

> MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-mimo-v2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.8 to 29.3.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 254 | 89 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1469 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1450 |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1436 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1459 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1245 |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1467 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1412 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1433 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1444 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1445 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and MiMo-V2.5 share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.