# Falcon-180B vs Mercury 2

> Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-mercury-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Mercury 2 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mercury 2 leads 53.8 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 39.1 |
| Rank | 260 | 175 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.75 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1171 |
| SciCode | — | 38.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1391 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.58 |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
- Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1362 |
| CritPt | — | 0.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Mercury 2: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1358 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
- Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1304 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
- Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1329 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1330 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
- Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1355 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1289 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1358 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Mercury 2?

Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Mercury 2 share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.