# Falcon-180B vs Magistral Medium

> Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-magistral-medium
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Medium in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Magistral Medium leads 46.5 to 29.3.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 34.8 |
| Rank | 254 | 224 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $5 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1319 |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1267 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 16.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 6.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1249 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1222 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1225 |
| LMArena French | — | 1268 |
| LMArena German | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1176 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1224 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1269 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1254 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1295 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1275 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Magistral Medium share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.