# Falcon-180B vs Llama 3.2 1B

> Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 19.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-llama-3-2-1b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 3.2 1B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Falcon-180B leads 29.3 to 21.4.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 19.9 |
| Rank | 254 | 349 |
| Context | — | 60K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.027 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 20.6 (#333)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 8.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1071 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 11.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Falcon-180B: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 14.5 (#142)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 10.8% |
| BALROG | — | 6.6% |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 15.6 (#304)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1044 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | 101.95 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 9.7 (#308)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1086 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#307)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 23.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1007 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 23.9 (#287)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 958 |
| LMArena German | — | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 941 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 52.6 (#285)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#269)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1050 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.4 (#305)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1055 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1030 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 200 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Llama 3.2 1B?

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 19.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Llama 3.2 1B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 1B has 22.