# Falcon-180B vs Llama 3.1-70B

> Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-llama-3-1-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.1-70B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Llama 3.1-70B leads 38.9 to 25.3.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 29.4 |
| Rank | 254 | 299 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 29.8 (#292)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1260 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.8% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Falcon-180B: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 24.9 (#104)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 6.9% |
| BALROG | — | 27.9% |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 20.8 (#215)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1241 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | 125.91 |
| DTBench | — | 60% |
| LMCA | — | 14.8% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 12.7 (#298)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 3.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 21% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1252 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 36.7% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 24.1 (#264)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 70.6% | 80.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 44.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 65.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1209 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 38.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1219 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1215 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1132 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1140 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1253 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 65.5 (#218)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1231 |
| IFEval | — | 82.1% |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#208)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1241 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 35.6 (#262)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1261 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1232 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1256 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 784 |
| WildBench | — | 75.8% |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Llama 3.1-70B?

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Llama 3.1-70B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-70B has 35.