# Falcon-180B vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-kimi-k2-thinking-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 60.2 to 29.3.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 45.4 |
| Rank | 254 | 63 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1428 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1429 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1439 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1425 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1329 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1407 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1403 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1373 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1414 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.