# Falcon-180B vs Kimi K2.5

> Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-kimi-k2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 leads 65.1 to 29.1.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 48.1 |
| Rank | 260 | 57 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.45 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Kimi K2.5: 48.8 (#53)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 73.8% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 70.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1437 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 67.3% |
| SciCode | — | 49% |
| WeirdML | — | 45.6% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1474 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 821.65 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Falcon-180B: —
- Kimi K2.5: 34.2 (#48)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 43.2% |
| OSWorld | — | 63.3% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 1,198 |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
- Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#80)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1453 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | 148.03 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 11.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 46.8% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 78.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 69.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 65.3% |
| CritPt | — | 3.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 3.4% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 69.4% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Kimi K2.5: 51.8 (#53)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 62.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 92.2% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1470 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 27.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#56)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 24.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 14.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1466 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Falcon-180B: —
- Kimi K2.5: 41.1 (#39)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1430 |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
- Kimi K2.5: 53.9 (#53)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1433 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena French | — | 1454 |
| LMArena German | — | 1441 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1410 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1435 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1450 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
- Kimi K2.5: 75.3 (#64)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1431 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 86.1% |
| CL-bench | — | 19.3% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 13.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1445 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
- Kimi K2.5: 65.1 (#53)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1423 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1444 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1579 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Kimi K2.5 share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 has 51.