# Falcon-180B vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

> Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-hunyuan-t1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 260 | 114 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1390 |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1399 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1414 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1385 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1384 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.