# Falcon-180B vs Grok 4.1

> Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-grok-4-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.1 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 leads 62.4 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 41.5 |
| Rank | 260 | 134 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1445 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Falcon-180B: —
- Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
- Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1435 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1422 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1417 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
- Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1438 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
- Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1400 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
- Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1437 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Grok 4.1?

Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Grok 4.1 share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.